Christmas came early for University of Minnesota President Joan Gabel, as the university’s Board of Regents voted 9 to 3 earlier this month to approve a conflict management plan paving the way for Gabel to join the board of directors of Securian Financial. The move would earn her an additional $130,000 per year, on top of the $1 million she is set to make at her day job as university president.
The problem? Securian also happens to have some $1 billion of business with the university as one of its vendors, hence the call for a conflict management plan — albeit one drafted not by an independent firm, but primarily by members of the president’s own staff.
But this isn’t even the first time this year that the board has been mired in questions of what might constitute an undue conflict of interest. Last summer, members disagreed whether it was appropriate for Gabel to offer the Duluth campus interim chancellor position — and its $250,000 salary — to former Regent David McMillan. Dissenters questioned the optics of the truncated search process juxtaposed against McMillan’s support the previous year for Gabel’s new compensation package.
Debating whether an apparent conflict is palatable enough to pass muster misses the forest for the trees. A regent’s duty is to maintain the public trust by keeping the interests of the public foremost in every decision and avoiding even the appearance of a conflict. Boards must act as fiduciaries that ensure responsible stewardship of tuition and taxpayer dollars.
Yet according to the latest data from the American Council of Trustees and Alumni’s “How Colleges Spend Money” project, the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus spends over $6,800 per student on administration, $1,700 more than the average of its peers, while charging nearly $3,000 more in tuition — for roughly the same graduation rates. This underscores the need for the board to go out of its way to make financial decisions that are above reproach.
In Minnesota, the Legislature, rather than the governor, is responsible for selecting members of public university boards, which it is poised to do again next session. Lawmakers have compelling reasons to choose trustees who will perform their duties with scrupulous attention to public trust.
This article originally appeared in the StarTribune on December 29, 2022. Read it here.
Wallace Hall, former regent at the University of Texas, courageously flagged admissions corruption and malfeasance in the system as far back as 2011. He faced scathing criticism and censure before being fully vindicated years later. He gave this speech upon accepting ACTA’s Jerry L. Martin Prize for Excellence in College Trusteeship on October 17, 2019.
Wallace Hall, Regent at the University of Texas, courageously flagged admissions corruption and malfeasance in the system as far back as 2011. He faced scathing criticism and censure before being fully vindicated years later. Here he describes his experience while accepting ACTA’s Jerry L. Martin Prize for Excellence in College Trusteeship on October 17, 2019.
Washington, DC – Wallace Hall, a former regent of the University of Texas System, will be presented with the Jerry L. Martin Prize for Excellence in College Trusteeship. This award recognizes dedicated and innovative leadership by college and university trustees. Through his work to clean up the University of Texas’s admissions process, Wallace Hall has […]
Launched in 1995, we are the only organization that works with alumni, donors, trustees, and education leaders across the United States to support liberal arts education, uphold high academic standards, safeguard the free exchange of ideas on campus, and ensure that the next generation receives an intellectually rich, high-quality college education at an affordable price.
Discover MoreSign up to receive updates on the most pressing issues facing our college campuses.