Campus Freedom Initiative™
Free expression is the necessary precondition for the unfettered search for truth on the college campus.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
An ACTA Report Card on Free Expression
ACTA’s Campus Freedom Initiative™ (CFI) has evaluated universities in several states against our Gold Standard for Freedom of Expression™, a 20-point action plan for reestablishing higher education’s commitment to excellence and open inquiry. Below we present the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Gold Standard evaluation. MIT receives credit for eight out of twenty Gold Standard measures. Our research highlights MIT’s strengths in protecting free expression and identifies areas it must work on to improve the student experience. Explore the full MIT Gold Standard evaluation to learn more.
ACTA Gold Standard for Freedom of Expression™| COMMIT TO A CULTURE OF FREE EXPRESSION | MIT |
|---|---|
| Adopt the Chicago Principles on Freedom of Expression or a similarly strong statement. | |
| Establish clear expectations regarding free expression in student and faculty handbooks and codes of conduct. | Policies related to this measure contain elements likely to chill free expression. |
| Include a free expression unit in new-student orientations. | No materials showing MIT meets this measure could be found in the orientation schedule. |
| Protect the diversity of political viewpoints by adopting an institutional neutrality policy such as the Kalven Report. | No evidence of MIT adopting an institutional neutrality policy could be found. |
| FOSTER CIVIL DISCOURSE | MIT |
| Sponsor campus debates that model civil discourse. | MIT has offered programming consistent with this measure in the past, but requests to university officials about the status of this programming remain unanswered. |
| Promote free expression by encouraging the establishment of student groups devoted to free expression, civil discourse, or representing a plurality of perspectives. | |
| Establish policies that protect free expression rights on campus and set clear consequences for disruption of sponsored speakers, events, and classes. | |
| Enforce policies that protect free expression rights on campus and apply clear consequences for disruption of sponsored speakers, events, and classes. | |
| Cultivate Intellectual Diversity | MIT |
| Encourage presidents, provosts, and deans to model respect for a broad range of viewpoints. | |
| Guarantee that viewpoint diversity is reflected in student life policies and practices. | |
| Support academic centers dedicated to free inquiry and intellectual diversity. | |
| Ensure faculty hiring, evaluation, and promotion processes are based on merit and make clear that the institution is open to intellectual diversity. | MIT no longer requires DEI statements, but some MIT job postings include DEI language that is incompatible with this measure. |
| Break Down Barriers to Free Expression | MIT |
| Eliminate speech and IT policies that have a chilling effect on free expression. | Policies related to this measure contain elements likely to chill free expression. |
| Ensure that enforcement of Title VI, Title VII, and Title IX does not infringe on free expression. | Policies defining harassment contain elements likely to chill free expression. |
| Disband bias response teams. | MIT allows students to report any bias concern. |
| Review student government policies to ensure viewpoint neutrality in student group recognition and funding. | Although student government prohibits discrimination in funding decisions for student organizations, there are no statements prohibiting discrimination in the recognition of student groups. |
| Advance Leadership Accountability | MIT |
| Include commitments to free expression in mission statements, values statements, strategic plans, and other key institutional documents. | |
| Include a commitment to free expression as a criterion in searches and evaluations for presidents, provosts, and deans. | A recent MIT dean position profile lists advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion as a responsibility of the role. There are no commitments or references to free expression in the profile. |
| Require free expression and viewpoint diversity training for administrative staff. | No evidence that MIT meets this measure could be found. Requests to university officials for such materials remain unanswered. |
| Conduct regular surveys or other quantitative studies of students and faculty to assess the state of free expression and intellectual diversity on campus. | MIT’s current campus climate survey does not meet this measure. |
WHO WE ARE
Launched in 1995, we are the only organization that works with alumni, donors, trustees, and education leaders across the United States to support liberal arts education, uphold high academic standards, safeguard the free exchange of ideas on campus, and ensure that the next generation receives an intellectually rich, high-quality college education at an affordable price.
Discover MoreSTAY INFORMED
Sign up to receive updates on the most pressing issues facing our college campuses.