ACTA in the NewsDonor Intent
The Next Step for Disaffected Donors
Americans’ confidence in our higher education system is at a historic low. According to a Gallup poll this summer, only 36 percent have real...
ANN ARBOR, MI — The University of Michigan is being sued by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni over alleged violations of the Freedom of Information Act.
In December, ACTA filed a complaint in the Michigan Court of Claims on behalf of Lance J. Johnson, a UM Law School graduate who made a gift to the school in 2007. Johnson previously said the gift was for an annual legal seminar to study the feasibility of appointing independent legal counsel for children involved in custody disputes. But Johnson claims the law school only “sporadically” had the workshop.
ACTA made a routine FOIA request seeking e-mail correspondence relating to the workshop on March 3, 2020, according to the complaint. UM responded a week later and extended its deadline by 10 days, only to respond five days after the extended deadline when it issued a best-efforts cost estimate in connection with the request, the complaint states.
UM estimated it would take just more than six hours to complete the request for $259.12, the complaint states. ACTA paid the fees in April, but the university did not acknowledge having received the payment until mid-June, and UM extended its deadline to Aug. 21 to complete the request, according to the complaint.
No documents were produced in August, and when ACTA followed up in October, the university gave a new estimated deadline of Oct. 30, the complaint states. After ACTA requested a status update in late October, UM said it would not provide records but rather an update in the following business days, according to the complaint.
ACTA threatened legal action, and in mid-November, the university produced a “partial response,” indicating it would provide a complete response by Dec. 9, the complaint states.
However, the university has not produced a complete response to date.
“ACTA has now waited over five months for records that, by the university own admission, should have taken no longer than seven hours to produce,” the complaint reads.
ACTA claims that the multiple extensions issued by the university are illegal under FOIA and requests that UM provide all documents sought in the FOIA request, as well as monetary relief, the complaint states.
“Transparency, accountability, and respect for donor intent should be at the heart of every college or university,” said Michael Poliakoff, president of ACTA. “The fact that such a prestigious public institution is obstructing a single donor’s wish to see the financial records connected to his gift is disheartening. I would have preferred not to resort to legal action, but (UM’s) failure to adequately respond to our request has given us no other option.”
ACTA’s deposit was sent during UM’s two-week stay-in-place order in October, and there was a delay in its receipt by the university, UM Spokesman Rick Fitzgerald said. During the 2020 calendar year, UM received more than 1,150 FOIA requests, a record-high number, Fitzgerald said.
The FOIA office is nearing completion of its review of additional documents, Fitzgerald said.
The original source can be found here»
Americans’ confidence in our higher education system is at a historic low. According to a Gallup poll this summer, only 36 percent have real...
Emily Koons Jae serves as Director of the Fund for Academic Renewal (FAR), a program of ACTA that works closely...
A few weeks ago, Ken Griffin’s $300 million contribution to Harvard University inspired an op-ed in Inside Philanthropy calling on universities to be more circumspect in allowing naming rights. Named gifts are easy targets for criticism, and many wealthy donors have been accused of making charitable contributions out of mere vanity or as a Quixotic attempt to cheat death.
When Shelby Cullom Davis gave $750,000 to Connecticut’s Trinity College in 1976 to endow a chair to teach private enterprise and entrepreneurship, he specified that there would be “no exceptions whatsoever” in the use of the money. A few years later, the college approached Davis about changing allocation of the funds because of evolving views […]
Given the level of vitriol that marked the six-year legal battle between Princeton University and the relatives of a former donor, it’s hardly surprising that Wednesday’s settlement to bring the lawsuit to a close was not, as some such accords are, of the “Can’t we all just get along?” group hug variety. The two parties […]
A cautionary tale to higher education donors’ considering a legacy gift Hillsdale College is well known for not taking government money. Last week the Michigan private school got a new reputation, by looting millions from a public university. The University of Missouri agreed to pay Hillsdale nearly $4.7 million to settle a lawsuit over the […]
Launched in 1995, we are the only organization that works with alumni, donors, trustees, and education leaders across the United States to support liberal arts education, uphold high academic standards, safeguard the free exchange of ideas on campus, and ensure that the next generation receives an intellectually rich, high-quality college education at an affordable price.
Discover MoreSign up to receive updates on the most pressing issues facing our college campuses.